| |
A SKELTON KEY TO CLASSICAL
(DRIVE THEORY)
VS. OBJECT RELATIONS THEORIES
Classical
(drive theory):
A drive is a want. Symptoms that are caused by unconscious
wants are symptoms that satisfy a need. The primary mode of action
of psychoanalysis is for patients to recognize their own design in their
symptoms, and thus to take responsibility for them.
"Drives"
that depersonalized or used other people were, by their nature, something
to be ashamed of. This is why the superego was unrecognized for the
first 25 years of Freud's work. This was the rationale for "naming"
interpretations as used by the early analyst. Patients were caught
in the act, their dodges exposed. the early analyst refused to be
swayed by rationalizations and denials (it took boldness and courage),
but first he had to win the patient's commitment (you were to rely on the
transference until it became a resistance).
Clients
are expected to cling to infantile wishes and unconsciously resist change.
The goal is to convince them of this, called "making the unconscious" conscious
or, later, "analyzing wishes." This is thought to unblock frozen
motives, freeing the client to "make conscious choices." Code phrase
is "resistance analysis."
Freud's
diagnostic emphasis: the analyst determined the patient's reality
(e.g., interpretations were confirmed by subsequent associations, not by
the patient). The patient's subjective reality was easily discounted.
This is why the big point of intersubjectivism, constructionism, and postmodernism
is that the patient's subjective experience counts.
Object
relations: The key way to distinguish
the alternative theories, object relations and "relational," from drive
theory, is that they are concerned with love, not sex, especially with
the need for parental love, which is far removed from the damning up and
discharge mechanics of libido theory. Needs for mothering and to
maintain self-esteem are felt to be fundamentally legitimate.
So what
most distinguishes object relations theory is the endorsement of
repressed wishes. The choice that the Freudian patient was to make
is the choice of sobriety, of mature self-containment, of the delay
of gratification. "Delay" has little meaning in relation to love,
especially maternal love, and self-esteem maintenance. Patients
are seen as "object seeking" to escape or repair internal objects.
This
approach is not about catching people in devious efforts at gratification
so that they can gain more control over their lives, but to make gratification
available, either by making patients feel safer or by making them aware
of new possibilities. The therapist really feels he or she is reparenting.
"Hard"
object relations theorists (Klein, Fairbairn, Kernberg) stress interpretation
even more than do classical theorists, but about content ("naming" interpretations)
rather than resistance or defense. "Soft" theorists are the most
revisionistic. They want to protect clients from interpretation (Winnicott's
"uninterpretation" and holding); also "empathy" is Kohut's code word for
interpretive forbearance. Clients not only do not resist, but want
to grow (Kohut), get better , and unconsciously "supervise," even "plan"
treatment (Weiss). Control-Mastery belongs here even though it is
wish-based and is the most purposivistic of all current theories, since
the wishes are all benign and concern object seeking. Hard to classify:
Mahler, Guntrip, Jacobson. |
|